Real Estate law is an essential part of everyday life. Whether you are buying or selling a house and dealing with disclosure issues, or you are wondering whether you or the other party can back out of the deal, or you are entering into a detailed office or apartment lease, or you are facing home foreclosure, contemplating a short sale, or in need of a loan modification, you need to know the basics of real estate law and what are the best options and strategies for your situation.

We will first try to negotiate a resolution; if we can’t, we are prepared to litigate these claims in court and we understand the intricacies involved with such claims. When you are encountering problems in the escrow process– such as delays in completing documentation, last minute title problems, or one party wanting to back out – we can help.
What if You Or The Other Party Want To Back Out of The Deal?
When the seller or buyer backs out of the deal without a valid legal excuse it is considered a breach of the contract. For example, most purchase and sale contracts for real property contain contingencies, which the parties must remove in writing and let the escrow holder know they have been removed before the purchase becomes final. The contingencies may be inspection contingencies, repair contingencies, and/or financing contingencies. This is called removing or waiving the contingencies.
If the seller backs out of the deal after the buyer has satisfied all contingencies, e.g. demonstrating financing, ability to purchase, this would normally constitute a breach of contract. The seller cannot back out of the sale of the property simply because he or she gets cold feet and does not want to sell the house or because the seller gets another offer that is better than the original offer. In these situations, the buyer can enforce the purchase contract by pursuing mediation or arbitration, or if that does not work, filing a suit for specific performance.
A suit for specific performance is a suit in equity where the buyer asks the court to order the seller to sell the property as previously agreed. The seller may also be required to pay the buyer damages based on the buyer’s out of pocket expenses and attorney’s fees.
Similarly, if a buyer backs out without a valid legal excuse, the seller may pursue mediation, arbitration or a lawsuit requesting the buyer pay damages including the costs incurred, a forfeiture of any purchase deposit, attorney’s fees etc. Since the seller has a duty to try to limit or “mitigate” his or her losses by continuing to try to sell the house to someone else, often the measure of damages is the difference between what the buyer who backed out was supposed to pay and the actual sales price to a subsequent buyer—assuming it was lower.
Because the amount of damages is often speculative or uncertain, many purchase contracts provide a liquidated damages clause—which contains a specific dollar amount for the seller’s maximum damages in the event of the buyer’s breach of the contract. However, these clauses are not always enforceable.
Also keep in mind, that there are situations where a deal may fall through without either side having violated the law—for example, where you (the buyer) try to fulfill the financing contingencies in good faith, and you are simply unable to get approval. In such situations, don’t assume that you will be sued or that you will owe the seller damages for backing out. But clearly, every case is different, and you should consult with a qualified attorney as soon as you encounter or anticipate a problem that could lead to a legal dispute. To paraphrase a well-known saying, “an ounce of prevention on the front-end is worth thousands of dollars on the back-end.”
Fraud And Non-Disclosure of Defects In The Selling Process
Fraud occurs when one person or business uses intentional deceit or trickery,misrepresentation or concealment to obtain value or gain an unfair advantage over another. In California, courts also recognize “negligent” misrepresentation as a form of fraud in some cases. For example, under California Real Estate law, a seller who negligently fails to disclose defects or problems concerning the property to be sold—can be liable for serious damages.
Real Estate Disclosure Law
If you are considering selling your house, we will guide you through the disclosure laws and any potential problems. If you bought a house and you have discovered a problem you think should have been disclosed, we will counsel you as to whether you have a valid claim and the best strategy that fits your situation.
Seller’s Duty To Disclose Structural Defects And Other Problems
If you have ever purchased or sold real estate in California, you know that duty of full disclosure, particularity as far as sellers are concerned, is a large part of the process. Sellers have extensive state and local disclosure obligations, as do agents for both buyers and sellers, and the subject has been an area of ongoing tension in the courts.
Most residential real estate agents use standard form California Association of Realtor (“CAR”) purchase and sale agreements and disclosure forms,– which, if properly completed, satisfy most of the seller’s disclosure obligations. We say “most” and not “all” because typically a form contract will anticipate most but not all of the property conditions that should be disclosed. Basically, the form asks the seller to disclose any problems with the roof, pests, structure, basement, attic, heating, cooling and any “latent” material defects or problems that could adversely affect the value of the property. For example, California requires the seller to disclose the presence of lead based paint in homes built before 1978 and any asbestos and radon.
The most important non-disclosure rule in California ( which stems from a 1984 Contra Costa County case called Easton vs. Strassburger, 152 CA3d 90, 199 CR 3) is that a seller must disclose any condition that could “materially” affect the buyer’s decision to buy the property. When you think about it, this could cover just about anything. It is a very subjective and vague standard. Even something as innocuous as a crack on your bedroom wall could mean nothing or it could be an indication of settlement problems. And just because you think a problem may have been fixed, e.g. damage from a prior flood, doesn’t mean you need not disclose it. Examples Include:
The key point is—when in doubt, Disclosure it. The potential consequence of non-disclosure is simply not worth the risk. And if you’re unsure whether to disclose, call Richard Korb for a free consultation. Richard has represented clients for over 30 years in fraud, concealment, and nondisclosure cases. Richard will review your documents, discuss the details of your situation with you and, if appropriate, visit the property before advising you. Richard will help you decide a clear strategy for either pursuing your rights or defending you against allegations of non-disclosure. Richard will guide and represent you each step of the way—in or out of court.
An Experienced Legal Team Handling Real Estate Disputes And Litigation in Berkeley, Oakland, Walnut Creek, Contra Costa, Alameda County, Oakland, Tri-Valley and the Bay Area
We represent buyers and sellers with integrity, commitment and aggressive advocacy in matters of real estate and non-disclosure litigation. Our goal is to achieve the best possible results in each and every case. To discuss any type of fraud-related concern with an attorney from our firm — call or contact us to make arrangements for a free initial consultation.
One of the key differences between KORB/LAW and other business litigation firms in the Bay Area is that Richard Korb is a proven litigator with over 30 years of court experience. In fraud and non-disclosure litigation, this experience and history of success tends to foster a more reasonable tone during negotiations with the other side and increases the chance of settling the matter in a fair and efficient manner, outside of court. Our practice includes claims alleging intentional or negligent misrepresentations of fact, omissions of fact and promissory fraud, including:
• Real estate fraud and Non-Disclosure
• Real Estate Partnership fraud
• Real Estate Investor fraud
For more information about our real estate and fraud litigation practice and how we can assist you, call us at (510) 524-0903, to arrange for a free initial consultation with our senior attorney-Richard Korb. Our operations allow us to be your Oakland real estate fraud attorney, Berkeley real estate fraud attorney, Walnut Creek real estate fraud attorney, Alameda County real estate fraud attorney and Contra Costa real estate fraud attorney.
Press Release - $9 Million Dollar Business Fraud Verdict
Oakland, California: Local Businessman Wins Over $9 Million Dollars Against National Corporation For Business Fraud And Breach of Contract
“On November 4, 2011, after three years of court battles in Texas and California, Pleasanton, CA business owner, Peter Allen and his attorney, Richard Korb, of the Korb Law Offices in Berkeley, CA, finally obtained justice…”
[Click Here To Read the Full Article...]
For more information on your lease or for a free consultation with an experienced Real Estate attorney in Berkeley-Oakland-Walnut Creek, please call Richard Korb at (510) 524-0903 and ask him how he can help you.